Despite two separate inquiries and a Royal Inquest the evidence still says the truth has been obscured for the past 12 years by a smoke-screen of lies, spies and cover-ups…

Princess Diana: 12 Years Of Lies, Spies And Cover-Ups

By Jon King

Henri Paul’s Blood – A ‘Drink-Drive Accident’

This year marks the 12th anniversary of Princess Diana’s death, and despite two separate investigations, both of which found that Diana’s death was the result of a drink-drive accident, and a Royal Inquest which dutifully arrived at a similar verdict, many still believe the princess was assassinated.

The official line remains that chauffeur Henri Paul was drunk and thus that Diana was the victim of a ‘drink-drive accident’.

But questions still remain regarding the veracity of Henri Paul’s blood test—the very test on which the verdict is based.

Why was the blood taken from the wrong part of the body? Why was it stored in a vial marked “unknown male? Why was it never DNA-tested to prove it belonged to Henri Paul?

And why was evidence given by Professor Peter Vanezis, Regis Professor of Forensic Medicine at Glasgow University, completely overlooked by the Royal Coroner?

To read the full article ~CLICK HERE~

View Escape The Illusion's Profile      Subscribe via RSS